Comparação: Consumo combinado (NEDC) Ford Ranger vs. concorrentes 2024

1.Generation 1999
Ranger 1. Generation (1. Facelift) 2002
2.Generation 2007
2.Generation (1. Facelift) 2009
Ranger 3. Generation 2011
Ranger 3. Generation (1. Facelift) 2016
Ranger 3. Generation (2. Facelift) 2019
Ranger 4. Generation 2022

Índice:

Ford Ranger - Qual é o consumo combinado (nedc) dos diferentes motores?

Motores Ford Ranger

(Consumo combinado (NEDC))
Motores Ford Ranger
MotorConsumo combinado (NEDC)
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 {automatic} 125 kW0 l/100km
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 125 kW0 l/100km
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW0 l/100km
Extrakabine 2.0 EcoBlue Tremor e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW0 l/100km
Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue e-4WD {automatic} 154 kW0 l/100km
Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW0 l/100km
Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue MS-RT e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW0 l/100km
Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW0 l/100km
1. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 {automatic} 125 kW ? l/100km
2. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 125 kW ? l/100km
3. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW ? l/100km
4. Extrakabine 2.0 EcoBlue Tremor e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW ? l/100km
5. Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue e-4WD {automatic} 154 kW ? l/100km
6. Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW ? l/100km
7. Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue MS-RT e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW ? l/100km
8. Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW ? l/100km

Variantes

Variantes Ford Ranger: Ranger vs. Ranger Raptor

(Consumo combinado (NEDC))
Consumo combinado (NEDC): Variantes Ford Ranger
Nome da varianteConsumo combinado (NEDC)
Ranger0 l/100km
Ranger Raptor0 l/100km
1. Ranger ? l/100km
2. Ranger Raptor ? l/100km

O consumo combinado (nedc) comparado com outros modelos Ford

Ford Ranger vs outros carros atuais da Ford

(Consumo combinado (NEDC))
Consumo combinado (NEDC): Ranger vs. outros modelos de Ford
Nome da varianteConsumo combinado (NEDC)
Focus Turnier Turnier 1.0 EcoBoost Trend 63 kW4.1 l/100km
Transit Connect Kombi {VAN} 210 L2 1.5 EcoBlue Basis 55 kW4.5 l/100km
Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost Styling-Paket 147 kW4.7 l/100km
EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 103 kW5.2 l/100km
Transit Courier {VAN} {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW5.3 l/100km
Transit Courier Kombi {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW5.8 l/100km
Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente 74 kW5.8 l/100km
Transit Kombi Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW6 l/100km
Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Titanium 4x4 {automatic} 178 kW6.3 l/100km
Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6.3 l/100km
Tourneo Custom 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 136 kW6.3 l/100km
Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6.4 l/100km
Transit Custom Kombi Nugget Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6.8 l/100km
Ranger Extrakabine 2.0 TDCi Stormtrak 4x4 {automatic} 156 kW6.9 l/100km
Mustang Convertible Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW9.1 l/100km
Mustang Fastback Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW12.4 l/100km
1. Focus Turnier Turnier 1.0 EcoBoost Trend 63 kW 4.1 l/100km
2. Transit Connect Kombi {VAN} 210 L2 1.5 EcoBlue Basis 55 kW 4.5 l/100km
3. Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost Styling-Paket 147 kW 4.7 l/100km
4. EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 103 kW 5.2 l/100km
5. Transit Courier {VAN} {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW 5.3 l/100km
6. Transit Courier Kombi {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW 5.8 l/100km
7. Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente 74 kW 5.8 l/100km
8. Transit Kombi Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW 6 l/100km
9. Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Titanium 4x4 {automatic} 178 kW 6.3 l/100km
10. Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 6.3 l/100km
11. Tourneo Custom 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 136 kW 6.3 l/100km
12. Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 6.4 l/100km
13. Transit Custom Kombi Nugget Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 6.8 l/100km
14. Ranger Extrakabine 2.0 TDCi Stormtrak 4x4 {automatic} 156 kW 6.9 l/100km
15. Mustang Convertible Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW 9.1 l/100km
16. Mustang Fastback Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW 12.4 l/100km

Como o consumo combinado (nedc) do Ford Ranger se compara aos seus concorrentes mais próximos?

Ford Ranger vs. carros similares

(Consumo combinado (NEDC))
Consumo combinado (NEDC): Ford Ranger vs. carros similares
Modelo do carroConsumo combinado (NEDC)
Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T MHEV 20215.8 l/100km
Toyota RAV4 2.0 20196 l/100km
Honda CR-V 1.5 Turbo 20186.3 l/100km
Ford Mustang Fastback 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 201812.4 l/100km
1. Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T MHEV 2021 5.8 l/100km
2. Toyota RAV4 2.0 2019 6 l/100km
3. Honda CR-V 1.5 Turbo 2018 6.3 l/100km
4. Ford Mustang Fastback 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 2018 12.4 l/100km

Carros semelhantes

VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Isuzu D-Max
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
SsangYong Musso
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Toyota Hilux
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Maxus T90 EV
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Ford Mustang
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (12.4 l/100km)


Comparar
SsangYong Torres
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Subaru BRZ
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Nissan Qashqai
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (5.8 l/100km)


Comparar
Toyota GT86/GR86
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar

Compare with ...

TOPlist