Comparação: Consumo combinado (NEDC) Mazda 3 vs. concorrentes 2024

BK 2003
BK (1. Facelift) 2006
BL 2009
BL (1. Facelift) 2011
BM 2013
BM (1. Facelift) 2017
BP 2019

Índice:

Mazda 3 - Qual é o consumo combinado (nedc) dos diferentes motores?

Motores Mazda 3

(Consumo combinado (NEDC))
Motores Mazda 3
MotorConsumo combinado (NEDC)
SKYACTIV-D 1.8 85 kW0 l/100km
SKYACTIV-D 1.8 SKYACTIV-Drive 85 kW0 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 90 kW0 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 90 kW0 l/100km
2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140 Prime-Line 103 kW0 l/100km
2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140 Prime-Line {automatic} 103 kW0 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 110 kW0 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 SKYACTIV-Drive 110 kW0 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid Selection AWD 132 kW0 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid Selection SKYACTIV-Drive 132 kW0 l/100km
SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid Selection 132 kW l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 137 kW0 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 137 kW0 l/100km
1. SKYACTIV-D 1.8 85 kW ? l/100km
2. SKYACTIV-D 1.8 SKYACTIV-Drive 85 kW ? l/100km
3. e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 90 kW ? l/100km
4. e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 90 kW ? l/100km
5. 2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140 Prime-Line 103 kW ? l/100km
6. 2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140 Prime-Line {automatic} 103 kW ? l/100km
7. e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 110 kW ? l/100km
8. e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 SKYACTIV-Drive 110 kW ? l/100km
9. e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid Selection AWD 132 kW ? l/100km
10. e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid Selection SKYACTIV-Drive 132 kW ? l/100km
11. SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid Selection 132 kW l/100km
12. e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 137 kW ? l/100km
13. e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 137 kW ? l/100km

Variantes

Variantes Mazda 3: 3 vs. 3 Fastback

(Consumo combinado (NEDC))
Consumo combinado (NEDC): Variantes Mazda 3
Nome da varianteConsumo combinado (NEDC)
30 l/100km
3 Fastback0 l/100km
1. 3 ? l/100km
2. 3 Fastback ? l/100km

O consumo combinado (nedc) comparado com outros modelos Mazda

Mazda 3 vs outros carros atuais da Mazda

(Consumo combinado (NEDC))
Consumo combinado (NEDC): 3 vs. outros modelos de Mazda
Nome da varianteConsumo combinado (NEDC)
2 SKYACTIV-G 115 i-ELOOP Sports-Line 85 kW4.7 l/100km
3 SKYACTIV-G 165 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line 121 kW5.1 l/100km
3 {sedan} SKYACTIV-G 165 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line 121 kW5.1 l/100km
6 {sedan} Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line 107 kW5.5 l/100km
6 Kombi Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line 107 kW5.6 l/100km
CX-3 SKYACTIV-G 150 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line AWD 110 kW5.9 l/100km
CX-5 SKYACTIV-G 194 Sports-Line SKYACTIV-Drive 143 kW6.4 l/100km
MX-5 RF SKYACTIV-G 131 Sakura 96 kW6.9 l/100km
MX-5 Roadster SKYACTIV-G 131 Sakura 96 kW6.9 l/100km
1. 2 SKYACTIV-G 115 i-ELOOP Sports-Line 85 kW 4.7 l/100km
2. 3 SKYACTIV-G 165 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line 121 kW 5.1 l/100km
3. 3 {sedan} SKYACTIV-G 165 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line 121 kW 5.1 l/100km
4. 6 {sedan} Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line 107 kW 5.5 l/100km
5. 6 Kombi Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line 107 kW 5.6 l/100km
6. CX-3 SKYACTIV-G 150 i-ELOOP Exclusive-Line AWD 110 kW 5.9 l/100km
7. CX-5 SKYACTIV-G 194 Sports-Line SKYACTIV-Drive 143 kW 6.4 l/100km
8. MX-5 RF SKYACTIV-G 131 Sakura 96 kW 6.9 l/100km
9. MX-5 Roadster SKYACTIV-G 131 Sakura 96 kW 6.9 l/100km

Como o consumo combinado (nedc) do Mazda 3 se compara aos seus concorrentes mais próximos?

Mazda 3 vs. carros similares

(Consumo combinado (NEDC))
Consumo combinado (NEDC): Mazda 3 vs. carros similares
Modelo do carroConsumo combinado (NEDC)
Aixam Emotion Coupé 20203.1 l/100km
Ligier JS 50 Diesel Progress ACT 20193.6 l/100km
Microcar M.Go 6 Diesel Progress ACT 20193.6 l/100km
Microcar Dué 6 Diesel Progress ACT 20193.6 l/100km
Casalini 550 20223.7 l/100km
Casalini M20 20223.7 l/100km
Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 75 20194.1 l/100km
Citroen C3 PureTech 83 Stop&Start 20204.2 l/100km
Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet 20174.3 l/100km
Renault Clio SCe 65 20194.9 l/100km
Renault Mégane TCe 115 GPF 20205.3 l/100km
Abarth 595 20166 l/100km
1. Aixam Emotion Coupé 2020 3.1 l/100km
2. Ligier JS 50 Diesel Progress ACT 2019 3.6 l/100km
3. Microcar M.Go 6 Diesel Progress ACT 2019 3.6 l/100km
4. Microcar Dué 6 Diesel Progress ACT 2019 3.6 l/100km
5. Casalini 550 2022 3.7 l/100km
6. Casalini M20 2022 3.7 l/100km
7. Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 75 2019 4.1 l/100km
8. Citroen C3 PureTech 83 Stop&Start 2020 4.2 l/100km
9. Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet 2017 4.3 l/100km
10. Renault Clio SCe 65 2019 4.9 l/100km
11. Renault Mégane TCe 115 GPF 2020 5.3 l/100km
12. Abarth 595 2016 6 l/100km

Carros semelhantes

Skoda Scala
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Casalini 550
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (3.7 l/100km)


Comparar
Casalini M20
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (3.7 l/100km)


Comparar
Aixam Emotion
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (3.1 l/100km)


Comparar
Ligier JS 50
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (3.6 l/100km)


Comparar
Microcar M.Go
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (3.6 l/100km)


Comparar
Microcar Dué
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (3.6 l/100km)


Comparar
VW Arteon
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Peugeot 308
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Ford Focus
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
Renault Mégane
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (5.3 l/100km)


Comparar
Opel Astra
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar
SEAT Leon
Consumo combinado (NEDC):
0% (0 l/100km)


Comparar

Compare with ...

TOPlist